Justia Blawg Search - Law Blogs, Lawyer Blogs, Legal Blogs Directory & Search Engine

California's High Court Clarifies CEQA's 30-Day Statute of Limitations

5 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm

Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/

Even Where No Environmental Review Was Undertaken, 30-Day Statute of Limitations for CEQA Challenge Applies Whenever NOD is Filed

22 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm by Meyers Nave

Earlier this month, in Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

Public Blawg - http://www.publiclawnews.com/blogs/public-blawg

An NOD Filed On A Facilities Master Plan In 2006 Applied To A 2010 Tree-Cutting Contract Awarded In Furtherance Of The Master Plan

12 Aug 2014, 11:07 am by Abbott & Kindermann

In finding the lawsuit to be untimely, the court emphasized the prior California Supreme Court decision in Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/

Second District Holds Short CEQA Statute Of Limitations Not Triggered By NOD That Fails To Provide Public Notice Of Material Changes In Project As Actually Constructed From That Described In EIR

29 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon

” While the filing of an NOD triggers a 30-day period “for all CEQA challenges to the decision announced in the notice” (quoting Committee For Green Foothills v. [read post]

CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com

Cal Supremes Opine On Statutes Of Limitation In CEQA Challenges

11 Feb 2010, 11:00 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)

In Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/

NODs Provide Bullet-Proof Protection 30 Days After Posting

17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm by Abbott & Kindermann

By Kate Hart In a decision filed on February 11, 2009, Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/

Second District Reaffirms Rule That Filing of Facially Valid NOD Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations And Plaintiff May Not “Go Behind” Agency’s Declarations In Document To Challenge Validity of Project Approval

9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon

” (Citing Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com

How Long Must a Notice of Determination be Posted?

14 Sep 2011, 9:20 am by Abbott & Kindermann

The court rejected the city’s argument that Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/

Notice of Determination's Thirty-Day Statute of Limitations May Not Apply to All CEQA Claims

7 May 2008, 10:43 am

In the Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/

First District Holds CEQA Statute Of Limitations Bars Citizens Group’s Challenge To College Of San Mateo Tree Cutting

23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am by Arthur F. Coon

” (Citing Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com

Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR

29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon

City of Los Angeles (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 368, 378 (“CEWM”), my April 9, 2020 post on which can be found here; Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com

No Fooling: A Facially Valid NOE Triggers a 35-Day Statute of Limitations

12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann

As predicted a few months back when blogging the Committee for Green Foothills case, in this recent Stockton Citizens case, the Supreme Court did indeed stand by the plain language of the statute and completely ignored all the alleged flaws in the approval process and corresponding policy issues surrounding the NOE. [read post]

Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/

Eight Is Not Enough: CEQA Challenge To Eighth Addendum To San Jose International Airport Master Plan EIR Is Rejected By Sixth District, Which Holds Plan Modifications To Accommodate Projected Decreases In Air Cargo and General Aviation Are Not “New Project” Requiring Supplemental or Subsequent EIR

15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon

” (Citing Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]

CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com

Supreme Engagement: CEQA’s Continuing Saga In California’s High Court

5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon

Committee For Green Foothills v. [read post]

CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com

Sixth District Affirms Judgment Dismissing CEQA Action For Failure To Timely Join Indispensable Real Party Within Limitations Period Triggered By Filing of Second, Valid NOD; Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Arguments Based On Relation Back, Estoppel, and City’s Violation of Statute Requiring It To Mail Operative NOD

1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon

’” (Citing Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]